THE European Parliament has overwhelmingly backed the recognition of a Palestinian state “in principleâ€, following a series of votes on the issue in EU nations that have enraged Israel.
Lawmakers approved the motion by 498 votes to 88 with 111 abstentions, although it was a watered-down version of an original motion which had urged EU member states to recognise a Palestinian state unconditionally.
The motion said the parliament “supports in principle recognition of Palestinian statehood and the two state solution, and believes these should go hand in hand with the development of peace talks, which should be advanced.â€
However Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is fiercely opposed to any resolution under which Palestine gains back the occupied East Jerusalem and West Bank, saying it would lead to “terroristsâ€causing regional problems.
“Attempts of the Palestinians and of several European countries to force conditions on Israel will only lead to a deterioration in the regional situation and will endanger Israel,†he said.
The socialist, greens and radical left groups in the European Parliament had wanted an outright call for the recognition of Palestinian statehood.
But the centre-right European People’s Party of European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker, the leading group in parliament, forced them into a compromise motion linking it to peace talks.
“There is no immediate unconditional recognition (of statehood),†EPP chief Manfred Weber said.
But his socialist counterpart Gianni Pittella insisted it was a “historic decision†and a “victory for the whole parliamentâ€.
Several European parliaments have passed motions urging their governments to recognise a Palestinian state in recent weeks in a bid to pressure Israel to relaunch the moribund peace process. France, Britain, Spain, Ireland and Portugal have all passed votes to that end.
Sweden has gone even further, officially recognising Palestine as a state.
EU court orders removal of Hamas from its terror blacklist
The historic European Parliament vote came hours after the General Court of the European Union ordered the removal of Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas from its terror blacklist.
The court ruled that the original listing in 2001 was based not on sound legal judgments but on conclusions derived from the media and the internet.
However it stressed that the decision to remove Hamas was based on technical grounds and does “not imply any substantive assessment of the question of the classification of Hamas as a terrorist groupâ€.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has hit out at the decision, saying Europeans appeared to have learned nothing from the Holocaust.
“In Luxembourg the European court removed Hamas from the list of terrorist organisations, Hamas that has committed countless war crimes and countless terror acts,†Netanyahu’s office quoted him as saying.
“It seems that too many in Europe, on whose soil six million Jews were slaughtered, have learned nothing,†he said.
At the start of a meeting with US Republican Senator-elect Joni Ernst, Netanyahu said: “But we in Israel, we’ve learned. We’ll continue to defend our people and our state against the forces of terror and tyranny and hypocrisy.
Founded in 1987 shortly after the start of the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising, Hamas was inspired by Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.
Its charter calls for the eventual destruction of Israel and the establishment of an Islamic state on the pre-1948 borders of British-mandated Palestine.
Geneva conference to ‘probe alleged Israeli war crimes’
Netanyahu also lambasted an international conference in Geneva that he said sought to probe accusations of Israeli war crimes.
Switzerland gathered diplomats from 126 of the 196 signatories of the Geneva Conventions to discuss protections for civilians, fulfilling a five-year-old request for such a conference from the UN General Assembly.
“Today we witnessed staggering examples of European hypocrisy,†Netanyahu said. “In Geneva they call for the investigation of Israel for war crimes.â€
Paul Fivat, Switzerland’s special ambassador for the Geneva Conventions, said that the intention was “not to accuse, it was not a tribunal ... it was a place simply for the parties to reiterate what is international lawâ€.
“This declaration is a signal that is being sent to conflicting parties, especially the civilian populations, that there is a law which is protecting their interests,†he told reporters.
The Palestinians warn that they may seek to sign up to the International Criminal Court and have threatened to file a suit against Israel over its July-August war against Hamas in the Gaza strip, in which more than 2000 Palestinians were killed, most of them civilians.