Jooyoung Shin is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Fiber Science and Apparel Design at Cornell University. Opinions in this piece belong to the author.

Reviewing the outfits, emeritus professor of clothing and textiles at Seoul National University, Minja Kim, celebrated the use of national motifs.

"Our uniforms feature ... the colors and lines of the 'taegeuk' symbol from the national flag -- white, red, blue and black. And the "Team Korea" calligraphy (represents) our national identity," she said in a phone interview, pointing out another hidden feature of the white jacket: a lining printed with the lyrics of the South Korean national anthem.

Diplomatic compromise

The shared flag and uniform have also become sources of controversy -- and not for the first time. In fact, the 2018 Winter Olympics will mark the 10th international sports competition since 1991 in which the two Koreas march together (and the fourth Olympic Games). On all of these occasions, athletes of both nations wore the same outfits. But they have always been supplied by the South.

Flag bearers Jang Choo Pak (left) of North Korea and Eun-Soon Chung of South Korea carry a special flag with the image of the Korean peninsula, at the head of their joint delegation during the opening ceremony of the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney 15 September 2000. Credit: JEFF HAYNES/AFP/AFP/Getty Images

But the designs were still largely based on the colors of South Korea's national flag, which uses black and a greater proportion of white (with less red) than North Korea's. This continued at the 2006 Turin Winter Games, where athletes wore white padded jackets with hints of red and blue (and a black-and-white striped scarf).

So while these Olympic uniforms all bore the unification flag a symbol that Korea is as one -- they have always been designed on the South's terms.

Few precedents

There are only two other examples of "united" teams in the history of Olympics: East and West Germany, and the former Soviet Union.

Athletes of the latter, a team comprised of former Soviet republics, wore a single style of uniform at both the Summer and Winter Olympics in 1992. At Albertville, male athletes wore gray coats with homburg hats and gray scarves, while female athletes sported salmon pink coats with pageboy hats.

Athletes from the Unified Team participated in the opening ceremony of the XVIth Winter Olympic Games on February 8, 1992 in Albertville. The united team was created following the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union and regroups five former Soviet republics (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Ukraine). Credit: STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images

With the design process conducted in secret, the uniforms offered the world no visual signals of the states' individual identities. Instead, the silhouettes of their coats reflected the contemporary fashion style -- wide-shouldered power dressing.

At the games in 1960 and 1964, the United Team of Germany adopted a flag that incorporated the Olympic rings (while using Beethoven's "Ode to Joy" as an anthem). But again, there are few sources documenting the compromise made when designing the team's outfits.

North Korea's athletes parade during the opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games on July 27, 2012 at the Olympic stadium in London. Credit: FABRIZIO BENSCH/AFP/AFP/Getty Images

So while there are some precedents, the designers of Korea's new uniform must look to the countries' own unique circumstances. This process raises difficult questions. Undoubtedly, the North Korean delegation would refuse to wear any outfit embedded with the South's most recognizable national symbols -- and vice versa.

Many of the features unveiled by the South last October, such as the national anthem print and calligraphy-inspired logo, will have to be removed. Moreover, due to the tight deadline, the uniforms' structure -- devised for optimal sporting performance -- may need to be modified to accommodate these changes.

The athletes of Team Korea in action during the Women's Ice Hockey friendly match against Sweden at Seonhak International Ice Rink on February 4, 2018 in Incheon, South Korea. The friendly match was held ahead of the Olympic Games where South and North Korea competes for the first time as a unified team in a sport at the Olympic Games. Credit: Woohae Cho/Getty Images AsiaPac/Getty Images

Seemingly small design decisions like this can carry significance on a global stage. Olympic opening ceremonies have become visual and narrative feasts of patriotic pride, with the Parade of Nations transforming stadia into dramatic runways to display, promote and advertise national identities.

Ceremonial parade uniforms have been part of this sporting ritual since the 1912 Olympics in Stockholm. As well as visually communicating national identity, they symbolize cultural attributes and political or economic ideals.

Members of the Olympic delegation of South Korea parade during the opening ceremony of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games at the National Stadium, also known as the "Bird's Nest," on August 8, 2008. Credit: AFP/AFP/AFP/Getty Images

The United States Olympic team enters the Opening Ceremony of the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics at Fisht Olympic Stadium on February 7, 2014 in Sochi, Russia. Credit: Ryan Pierse/Getty Images Europe/Getty Images

Parade uniforms may affect the psychology of athletes. Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the International Olympic Committee, recognized the importance of national attire in helping athletes develop and focus their mental readiness for competition.

For individual wearers, the parade uniform indicates their identity and role as a member of a national team. It can also enhance a sense of unification among athletes. Uniforms are important visual media which separate people of one nation from others (dissimilarity), while connecting those who belong to the same nation (similarity) through a process of identification, communication and unification.

A superficial response

So, looking ahead to the Koreas' joint uniform, it is understandable that many in the South are skeptical of how it will represent their national identity. Symbols are an essential part of constructing the image of a nation, which, in turn, shapes the perceptions of wearers and spectators alike.

But a design borne of compromise may carry little significance for athletes from either side, who were born and raised in a divided Korea. Imposing an alternative identity may weaken participants' sense of national pride, damaging their sense of motivation and even performance.

In 2006, athletes from South and North Korea marched together in a show of unity at the opening ceremony of the 20th Winter Olympics in Turin, Italy. Credit: ERIC FEFERBERG/AFP/AFP/Getty Images

Of course, national identity is being undermined to serve a new purpose: symbolizing unification and reconciliation efforts. It could be argued that the team's new identity represents an Olympic spirit that promotes peace and unity. But dressing athletes in a joint uniform may be only that -- dressing, rather than inspiring a true sense of solidarity between two sides who, politically, economically and ideologically, share so little in common.

South Korean Olympians and models pose during an official uniform launch at Taereung National team training center on April 27, 2016 in Seoul, South Korea, ahead of the 2016 Rio Olympic Games. Credit: Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images AsiaPac/Getty Images

Nonetheless, the question remains: What real purpose does a parade uniform, a shared flag and a forced national identity serve? Are they just superficial responses to serious political issues and North Korea's ongoing threats of war?

The joint uniform conveys nothing but a simplistic message that Korea is one. But South and North Korea are two sovereign nations who were established on different ideologies and now share few cultural attributes.

South Korean speed skater Lee Bora (left) and North Korean figure skater Han Jong-In lead their delegation as they arrive for the opening ceremony of the 2006 Winter Olympics at the Olympic stadium in Turin, Italy. Credit: ERIC FEFERBERG/AFP/AFP/Getty Images

Rather than repeating a gesture that has, over multiple Olympics, failed to bring significant improvement to relations, the two countries should work toward constructing a meaningful shared identity that can resonate in the hearts and minds of all Koreans. Until then, the teams should wear separate outfits and march as two independent nations. A compromised identity serves no purpose for either side.